Street atlas
Mapped section in Johannesburg, Gauteng. City of Johannesburg OSM municipal area. Reference point: -25.98711, 28.18196. Connects to Blue Angel Fish Street in this directory.
Counts named place and passenger transport records around one selected point on the street. The lists below the map measure along the whole mapped section instead, so their totals differ.
Straight-line radius from the selected point. Area markers use an interior point, not an entrance.
For Angelfish Street in Johannesburg, the road lines shown here total 3.35 km. This section connects to 5 street names in this directory.
Within 500 m of these lines, the snapshot contains 3 named place records, including 3 in shops & services.
Distances are measured in a straight line from the nearest part of the street. Places may be near different sections. Areas use an interior point, not an entrance. These are source records, not unique venues or walking distances. Activity is not corroborated: records come from the September 2026 map snapshot, and an object's edit date does not confirm that a venue operates.
Connected sections in this directory share source nodes at compatible levels. Junctions with streets outside this directory are not listed. Names appear once here; nearby sections are listed separately below.
Shortest distance between mapped geometries, not a walking distance.
This is an OpenStreetMap road classification, not a statement about land use.
highwayhighway=residential · 9 segments · 3,354 mRecorded on 9 of 9 mapped segments; 0 without this tag.
Tag coverage by geometry length: 3,354 m of 3,354 m (100.0%). Unknown: 0 m (0.0%).
Lengths refer to the represented road lines, not surveyed road or pavement lengths.
surfacesurface=asphalt · 9 segments · 3,354 mRecorded on 9 of 9 mapped segments; 0 without this tag.
Tag coverage by geometry length: 3,354 m of 3,354 m (100.0%). Unknown: 0 m (0.0%).
Recorded on 9 of 9 mapped segments.
Lengths refer to the represented road lines, not surveyed road or pavement lengths.
Tags describe individual mapped segments. They do not establish one traffic direction for the whole street: separate carriageways can be mapped as separate one-way lines, and untagged lines are unknown, not two-way.
onewayoneway=yes · 4 segments · 490 mRecorded on 4 of 9 mapped segments; 5 without this tag.
Tag coverage by geometry length: 490 m of 3,354 m (14.6%). Unknown: 2,864 m (85.4%).
Lengths refer to the represented road lines, not surveyed road or pavement lengths.
sidewalkNo value in the source.
Recorded on 0 of 9 mapped segments; 9 without this tag.
Tag coverage by geometry length: 0 m of 3,354 m (0.0%). Unknown: 3,354 m (100.0%).
Values apply to their individual tagged segments and sides. Left and right follow the direction of each individual source way; they are not a single orientation for the whole street. An explicit no means no pavement on the tagged segment or side; a missing tag is unknown, and separate means a pavement mapped independently.
Lengths refer to the represented road lines, not surveyed road or pavement lengths.
This map data does not establish a single traffic direction for the Angelfish Street section shown in Johannesburg. Recorded tags: One-way tag on 15% of the mapped length; 85% not recorded. Tags describe individual mapped segments. They do not establish one traffic direction for the whole street: separate carriageways can be mapped as separate one-way lines, and untagged lines are unknown, not two-way. Check road signs on site before driving.
It shows the mapped section in this directory: 3.35 km of road lines in Johannesburg. The street may continue beyond this mapped section. No completeness is claimed. Line length is not a surveyed street length.
The lists on this page measure a straight line from the nearest part of the whole mapped section: places within 500 m and passenger transport within 1 km. Two listed places can therefore be near opposite ends. The interactive map instead counts records around one selected point on the street, including transport, so its totals differ. None of these are walking distances.